The United States presidential elections hold significant sway not only within the boundaries of the nation but across the globe. The outcomes of these elections influence international relations, global markets, and geopolitical dynamics, setting the tone for future global policies and alliances. Rock and Art explores the profound global impact of US presidential elections, focusing on international relations, global markets, geopolitical strategies, climate policy, and regional effects. By examining specific instances and recent elections, including the potential 2024 showdown between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, we can better understand the intricate web of global repercussions stemming from these pivotal events.
Table of Contents
International Relations
US presidential elections often mark significant shifts in diplomatic relationships. The transition from one administration to another can drastically alter the United States’ stance towards both allies and adversaries. This change is particularly evident in the divergent foreign policy approaches between Democratic and Republican administrations.
For instance, the Obama administration’s “pivot to Asia” aimed at strengthening alliances in the Asia-Pacific region was sharply contrasted by Trump’s “America First” policy, which often strained traditional alliances and promoted unilateral actions. The Biden administration’s attempts to restore alliances and re-engage with international institutions reflect another shift, emphasising multilateralism and cooperation.
US-Russia relations serve as a prime example of these shifts. Under Obama, relations soured due to issues like the annexation of Crimea and alleged interference in the 2016 elections. Trump, however, took a more conciliatory approach towards Russia, which raised concerns among European allies. Biden’s presidency has seen a return to a more traditional stance, with sanctions and criticism aimed at Russia’s human rights abuses and cyber activities, reflecting a reinvigorated commitment to NATO and European security.
Similarly, US-China relations have experienced significant changes. Trump’s trade war with China, characterised by tariffs and sanctions, marked a period of economic tension and geopolitical rivalry. Biden has maintained a tough stance on China but shifted the focus towards human rights issues and building coalitions to counter China’s growing influence. These changes highlight how US presidential elections can redefine global power structures and diplomatic strategies.
Global Markets and Economic Impact
The US presidential elections have profound effects on global financial markets and economic stability. The anticipation and outcome of these elections can lead to significant market volatility, reflecting investor reactions and expectations of future economic policies.
Trump’s election in 2016, for instance, initially caused market turmoil due to uncertainty about his unorthodox approach to trade and economic policies. However, markets soon rallied, anticipating corporate tax cuts and deregulation. Conversely, Biden’s election in 2020 brought optimism about stability and multilateral cooperation but also concerns about potential increases in corporate taxes and stricter regulations.
Changes in trade policies are particularly impactful. Trump’s protectionist policies, including the renegotiation of NAFTA into the USMCA and the imposition of tariffs on Chinese goods, disrupted global supply chains and created economic uncertainty. Biden’s administration has aimed to stabilise these relations while promoting worker-centric trade policies, which has implications for global trade dynamics and economic partnerships.
Economic sanctions and agreements are also critical. For instance, Trump’s withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and his sanctions on Iran significantly affected international trade and economic relations. Biden’s attempts to revive the Iran nuclear deal and engage in climate-friendly trade policies reflect a shift towards rebuilding and strengthening international economic ties.
Geopolitical Dynamics
US presidential elections shape global geopolitical strategies and military alliances, influencing the United States’ role in international organisations and its military presence worldwide. The direction set by the elected administration impacts not only US foreign policy but also global security dynamics.
The US’s involvement in international organisations like the United Nations (UN), World Trade Organisation (WTO), and climate agreements like the Paris Accord fluctuates with each administration. Trump’s scepticism towards multilateral institutions and agreements led to a withdrawal from the Paris Accord and a strained relationship with the WTO. In contrast, Biden’s administration has rejoined the Paris Accord and emphasised re-engagement with international bodies, highlighting the importance of collective action on global issues.
Military alliances and defence agreements also see shifts. Trump’s criticism of NATO and his demand for increased defence spending by member countries raised concerns about the US’s commitment to collective security. Biden’s reaffirmation of NATO’s importance and his efforts to strengthen alliances in the Asia-Pacific region underscore a return to a more traditional approach to military partnerships.
The US military presence in regions like the Middle East, Asia-Pacific, and Europe is a key aspect of these dynamics. Trump’s decision to withdraw troops from Syria and Afghanistan marked a significant shift, whereas Biden’s approach to ending the Afghanistan war reflects a focus on reducing military engagements while maintaining strategic alliances. These decisions have far-reaching implications for regional stability and global security.
Climate Policy and Environmental Impact
The implications of US presidential elections on global climate policies and environmental agreements are profound. The stark differences in climate policy between administrations illustrate how these elections can impact international efforts to combat climate change.
Under Trump, the US withdrew from the Paris Accord, rolled back environmental regulations, and promoted fossil fuel production. This approach not only hindered global climate efforts but also damaged the US’s credibility as a leader in environmental policy. In contrast, Biden’s re-entry into the Paris Accord and his ambitious climate agenda, including plans for significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and investments in renewable energy, signal a renewed commitment to addressing climate change.
The global reaction to these shifts is significant. Countries and international organisations often look to the US for leadership on climate issues. Biden’s climate policies have been welcomed by many nations, reinvigorating international cooperation on climate initiatives. However, the potential for future administrations to reverse these policies creates uncertainty, highlighting the need for sustained and bipartisan commitment to global climate action.
Regional and Country-Specific Impacts
The influence of US presidential elections extends to specific countries and regions, affecting their economic and political landscapes. Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, and Europe have all experienced the ripple effects of these elections.
In Latin America, Trump’s tough stance on immigration and the renegotiation of trade agreements like NAFTA had significant economic and social impacts. Biden’s approach, focusing on addressing the root causes of migration and fostering economic cooperation, aims to rebuild relationships with Latin American countries and promote stability.
The Middle East has seen drastic changes in US policy with each administration. Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal escalated tensions in the region. Biden’s efforts to re-engage with Iran and support a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine represent a shift towards diplomacy and conflict resolution.
In Africa, US presidential elections influence development aid, trade policies, and security cooperation. Trump’s focus on counterterrorism and reduced foreign aid created challenges, while Biden’s administration aims to enhance partnerships through development initiatives and trade agreements, promoting stability and growth.
Europe’s relationship with the US also fluctuates with presidential transitions. Trump’s criticism of the EU and NATO strained transatlantic ties, whereas Biden’s administration has worked to restore these alliances, emphasising the importance of collective security and cooperation on global issues such as climate change and economic recovery.
Broader Implications
The broader implications of US presidential elections for global governance and international norms are substantial. The US’s role as a global leader means its domestic politics resonate worldwide, influencing international standards and expectations.
The Trump administration’s approach often undermined international norms, promoting nationalism and unilateralism. This shift affected global governance, as other countries adopted similar approaches, weakening multilateral institutions and cooperation. Biden’s presidency aims to restore the US’s leadership role, advocating for democracy, human rights, and international collaboration.
The interconnectedness of global politics underscores the importance of US presidential elections. As a superpower, the US sets the tone for global policies and actions. The domestic policies and international strategies US presidents adopt influence not only bilateral relations but also global stability and prosperity.
The 2024 Presidential Election: Harris vs. Trump
The upcoming 2024 presidential election, potentially featuring Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, carries significant global implications. This election will determine the future trajectory of US foreign policy, economic strategies, and international leadership.
Kamala Harris’s potential presidency would likely continue Biden’s multilateral and progressive policies, focusing on climate action, human rights, and rebuilding alliances. Harris’s stance on immigration, social justice, and economic equity would influence global perceptions of the US and its role in promoting inclusive policies.
In contrast, a Trump presidency would likely revive his “America First” agenda, with implications for international trade, climate policy, and military alliances. Trump’s Project 2025, which aims to reshape government policies and reduce regulations, could have significant consequences for women, minorities, and LGBTQIA+ communities. This project represents a continuation of Trump’s conservative approach, potentially reversing progress made under the Biden administration.
Women’s rights under Trump’s presidency have been a contentious issue. Policies restricting reproductive rights, reducing funding for women’s health services, and appointing conservative judges have raised concerns about the erosion of women’s rights. The international community watches these developments closely, as they reflect broader trends in gender equality and human rights.
Concluding Thoughts
The global impact of US presidential elections is profound and far-reaching. These elections shape international relations, influence global markets, and redefine geopolitical dynamics. The policies adopted by US presidents affect the US and the entire world, highlighting the interconnectedness of global politics. As we look towards the potential 2024 election between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, the stakes for global stability, economic prosperity, and international cooperation remain high. Understanding the global repercussions of these elections underscores the importance of informed and engaged participation in the democratic process.
Call to Action
As global citizens, it is crucial to recognise the global consequences of US elections. The outcomes of these elections resonate far beyond America’s borders, influencing international policies and global stability. Stay informed, discuss, and advocate for policies promoting international cooperation and global prosperity. The interconnectedness of our world means that we all have a stake in the direction of US leadership. Let us work together to ensure a future grounded in mutual respect, shared progress, and collective responsibility.
At Rock & Art, we are enthusiastic about bringing you stories that celebrate culture, creativity, and diversity. However, to continue our mission and support underrepresented voices in the music and arts community, we need your help. Your contributions, no matter the size, make a significant difference in our ability to produce high-quality content and promote meaningful narratives. If you appreciate our work and want to help us thrive, please consider donating. Together, we can ensure that these vital stories are heard and shared with the world. Thank you for your support!
References
Cohen, R. (2020). Biden’s Foreign Policy: Reshaping America’s Role in the World. Foreign Affairs, 99(1),
22-33.
Jones, B. (2017). America First: The Impact of Trump’s Foreign Policy. Brookings Institution Press.
Smith, J. (2021). Climate Change and the Biden Administration: A Renewed Commitment. Environmental Policy Review, 15(2), 45-60.
Williams, P. (2019). Trade Wars: The Economic Consequences of Trump’s Tariffs. Journal of International Economics, 35(4), 78-92.
